Christopher added a comment.

  @Smalyshev so, by stating that geometry and CRS are different, you then 
concur with the main arguments referenced above that they should not be 
conflated in a simple literal.  @Daniel I agree with the idea of specifying the 
CRS as an additional component of the GlobeCoordinate data value separately 
from the geometry.
  
  I do not agree that a Wikidata entity can be inferred to be a CRS without it 
providing or pointing to a serialization that can be validated against a known 
CRS encoding (z.B. gml:GeodeticCRS).  Stating that a CRS is an instance of a 
"geodetic reference system" is only a concept pointer, and does not provide the 
syntax of a CRS schema which is necessary for a software to understand the 
meaning of a geometry.
  
  In summary, these are the reasons why a CRS should not be represented as a 
URI in a simple WKT literal string (that contains point geometry).
  
  1. geometry and its CRS are just two separate things
  2. it becomes much harder to use the CRS as a filter in a SPARQL query
  3. it is not possible to assign multiple CRS specifications to a geometry
  4. the domain of a CRS specification should not be limited to a single 
geometry
  5. The CRS is a URI, so it should be published as one
  6. It is not possible to assign a CRS to a collection of geometries (e.g. a 
dataset)
  7. Software libraries that handle WKT geometry do not expect a CRS as start 
of the string
  
  The current use of simple geo:wktLiteral for WGS84 points is fine, but if a 
Wikidata goal is to introduce more complex GIS spatial data (which I think 
would be very worthwhile), then the implementation should adhere to justifiable 
and reasonable standards for the data representation.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T129072

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Christopher
Cc: daniel, Smalyshev, Christopher, Aklapper, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, FloNight, 
Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to