| Liuxinyu970226 added a comment. |
In T180771#3787591, @C933103 wrote:Almost all the Hani text being discussed and used related to the nan.wp project now are Hant. Disregarding Hans for now and use Hani instead of Hant would probably do the job in the current setting but what about when mainland China Hans users start visiting and editing the site?
I don't think Hans should be considered in any kinds of Min, as some examples, the "只" and "隻"; "嬭" and "奶"; "发" and "發", … which are two-two having same means in Mandarin, are having totally different means, thus the Hans create a number of ambiguous in Min.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Liuxinyu970226
Cc: Liuxinyu970226, Aklapper, C933103, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: Liuxinyu970226, Aklapper, C933103, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
