Dear Martynas,

I understand your concern. Markus already commented on the Quads and the
fact that there are no where used in the way you suggest it. I am thankful
for critically accompanying our design phase, but I would again ask you for
some patience until we have the RDF mapping drafted.

We are very well aware of the advantages and importance of using Semantic
Web standards. And I know well what a Semantic Web application is. Heck,
check my CV. I've been two times finalist for the Semantic Web Challenge.
And I know many people involved in the provenance working group, as well as
those who have been working on standards like RDF and OWL. So even though
this doesn't mean much -- people should be judged by their actions, not by
their pedigree or social network -- I at least hope that you will be able
to wait until we drafted our RDF mapping document. I would hope that, as
soon as we do that, you will again critically review our work.

Cheers,
Denny


2012/4/6 Martynas Jusevicius <[email protected]>

> Hey Denny,
>
> I gave it a shot:
>
> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/France>
> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/PopulatedPlace/populationDensity>
> "116"^^<http://dbpedia.org/datatype/inhabitantsPerSquareKilometre>
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
> <http://dbpedia.org/resource/France>
> <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/populationDensity>
> "116"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double>
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
>
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012>
> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/date>
> "2012"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#year>
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012>
> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/source> _:source
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
> _:source <http://purl.org/dc/terms/published>
> "2010"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#year>
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
> _:source <http://purl.org/dc/terms/title> "Bilan demographique"@fr
> <http://wikidata.org/graphs/France2012> .
>
> The syntax is N-Quads. It does not use reification, but instead named
> graphs for provenance. The necessary concepts were already present in
> DBPedia.
>
> As you might know, temporal provenance is not the strongest point of
> RDF. However conventions and solutions are available, and I am sure
> implementing them would require far less effort than creating a custom
> data model from scratch, not to mention the benefits of potential
> reuse.
> There's quite some research done on RDF provenance, which is worth
> looking into if provenance is really a key feature for Wikidata from
> day one. I see it as something that should work transparently behind
> the scenes, and therefore could be rolled-out later on.
>
> You would get much better and more extensive advice than mine on
> [email protected] -- the only prerequisite is willingness to
> cooperate.
>
> RDF's strength is that it solves data integration problems by pivotal
> conversion, reducing the number of model transformations from
> quadratic to linear:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_conversion#Pivotal_conversion
> A custom data model brings up questions which already have an answer
> in the Semantic Web stack:
> # can data from different Wikidata instances be merged or interlinked
> natively?
> # is there a native query language? In case of SQL, how performant
> will it be given many JOINs and the planned use of provenance?
> # what and how many custom serialization formats and API mechanisms
> will have to follow?
>
> Stacking one custom solution on top of another can eventually result
> in huge costs. I honestly think the energy of Wikidata could be
> directed in a more productive way.
>
>
> Martynas
> graphity.org
>
>
> 2012/4/5 Denny Vrandečić <[email protected]>:
> > Dear Martynas,
> >
> > if you try to model the following statement in RDF
> >
> > "The population density of France, as of an 2012 estimate, is 116 per
> square
> > kilometer, according to the "Bilan demographique 2010"."
> >
> > you might notice that RDF requires a reification of the statement. The
> data
> > model that you have seen provides us with an abstract and concise way to
> > talk about these reifications (i.e. via the statement model, just as in
> > RDF).
> >
> > We still have not finished the document describing how to map our data
> model
> > to OWL/RDF, but we have thought about this the whole time while
> discussing
> > the data model.
> >
> > But if you find a simpler, and more RDFish way to express the above
> > statement, please feel free to enlighten me. I would be indeed very
> > interested.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Denny
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/4/5 Martynas Jusevicius <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> it doesn't look like reuse of existing concepts and standards is a
> >> priority for this project.
> >> One cannot build a Semantic Web application by ignoring its main
> >> building block, which is the RDF data model.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Project director Wikidata
> > Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
> > Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de
> >
> > Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
> > Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg
> unter
> > der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
> > Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikidata-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>



-- 
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to