"Daniel Kinzler" <[email protected]> writes: > Am 10.03.2014 15:53, schrieb P. Blissenbach: > > If you read linguist literature, you'll find no clear cut definion of > > "lexeme" across all languages (nor "word" for that matter), you will find > > that relating lexemes of different languages per their semantic values > > (vulgo > > "translation") can be extremely difficult, and you will find lots of edge > > cases ("1" being a lexeme of many languages? Or none at all?) -- so coming > > to > > a workable solution about the meaning of "lexeme" and relations between > > labels and lexemes, and their possible other properties should be worth our > > while. > > In that context - Purodha, what's your take on the Wiktionary proposal > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary>? I'm curious what you > think > of it. We briefly talked about this kind of model in Amsterdam last year - I > hope the proposal is what you hoped for, at least roughly :)
I read it and I am thinking it over :-) It's sufficiently general to be useful, but there are points that need further refinement, or modifications. I shall write some comments in a while. Purodha _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
