Why do you have to get lost in them ?

Most already have the phrase "ID" or "Identifier" in their naming
convention.  So perhaps a better approach would be to standardize the
naming convention used for External Identifiers and make it a best practice
and golden rule during property creation and voting.  A further refinement
could be to enhance the statement selector with an option for "ID" or "WP
ID" or "Descriptor".

I think a simple naming convention would suffice (and clean up the existing
ones):  <blah> ID such as for example:

CANTIC ID
Freebase ID
Munzinger IBA ID
NLP ID
dmoz ID
Oxford Biography Index ID
SELIBR ID
etc..


Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Denny Vrandečić <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is there any external key which is not of data type string and vice versa?
>
> Also, no matter whether this gets done or not, please don't remove
> qualifiers and references from these statements (I.e. explicitly don't
> treat them like sitelinks)
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015, 17:36 Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all --
>>
>> Have we considered separating in some way (in the UI, and possibly the
>> data model) properties which track identifiers in external databases vs.
>> properties that describe the item using Wikidata-internal links? As more
>> and more external identifiers are added, it's easy to get lost in them
>> while looking for the right property to describe an item.
>>
>> We're effectively already doing this with Wikimedia identifiers by
>> calling them "sitelinks" and it seems like a potential logical extension of
>> that concept to group other kinds of external identifiers in their own
>> section rather than having CANTIC, BIBSYS identifiers, Freebase identifiers
>> or even DMOZ links mixed together with the primary descriptors of an author
>> or work, for example.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Erik
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to