Ah, as Markus mentions, since we already have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/ Property:P214
Then the rest of the problem is just a readability issue. So there is no need for renaming property names as I suggested and suffixing with ID.... P214 solves the grouping problem fairly easily. And Lydia says readability in general is going to improve...just wait. So, I am looking forward to the site display improvements in the future and more use of P214. Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Joe Filceolaire <[email protected]> wrote: > Best to have a statement (instance of:wikidata database index property) > instead of trying to do this with the English language label as it is > easier to localise statement s. > On 4 Apr 2015 17:23, "Helder ." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Smolenski Nikola <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Citiranje Thad Guidry <[email protected]>: >> >> I think a simple naming convention would suffice (and clean up the >> existing >> >> ones): <blah> ID such as for example: >> >> >> >> CANTIC ID >> >> Freebase ID >> >> Munzinger IBA ID >> >> NLP ID >> >> dmoz ID >> >> Oxford Biography Index ID >> >> SELIBR ID >> > >> > How would you name ISBN, for example? ISBN ID? :) >> >> And how would this work with translations? >> >> Helder >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
