I think we could ask either Yago or BabelNet or both whether they would be
receptive to release their mappings under a CC0 license, so it can be
integrated into Wikidata. What I wonder is, if they do that, whether we
wanted to have that data or not.

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:18 AM Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:

> One problem with BabelNet is that its licence is restrictive, being
> the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
> license.  Downloading BabelNet is even more restrictive, requiring also
> working at a research institution.
>
> Yago
>
> http://www.mpi-inf.mpg.de/departments/databases-and-information-systems/research/yago-naga/yago/
> , which has the less restrictive license Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY
> 3.0),
> has links between Wikipedia categories and Wordnet.  Unfortunately, it does
> not carry these links through to regular Wikipedia pages.   I've been
> toying
> with making this last connection, which would be easy for those categories
> that a linked to Wikipedia page.
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>
> PS:  Strangely the Yago logo has a non-commercial license.  I don't know
> why
> this was done.
>
> On 08/15/2017 10:32 AM, Finn Aarup Nielsen wrote:
> >
> > I do not think we have a Wiktionary-wordnet link.
> >
> > But I forgot to write we have a BabelNet Wikidata property,
> > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P2581. This property has been
> very
> > little used: http://tinyurl.com/y8npwsm5
> >
> > There might be a Wikimedia-Wordnet indirect link through BabelNet
> >
> > /Finn
> >
> >
> > On 08/15/2017 07:22 PM, Denny Vrandečić wrote:
> >> That's a great question, I have no idea what the answer will turn out
> to be.
> >>
> >> Is there any current link between Wiktionary and WordNet? Or WordNet and
> >> Wikipedia?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:14 AM <f...@imm.dtu.dk <mailto:f...@imm.dtu.dk>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     I have proposed a Wordnet synset property here:
> >>
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Wordnet_synset_ID
> >>
> >>     The property has been discussed here on the mailing list more than a
> >>     year ago, but apparently never got to the point of a property
> >>     suggestion:
> >>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikidata/2016-April/008517.html
> >>
> >>     I am wondering how the potential property fits in with the new
> >>     development of the Wiktionary-Wikidata link. As far as I see the
> senses,
> >>     for instance, at
> http://wikidata-lexeme.wmflabs.org/index.php/Lexeme:L15
> >>     link to wikidata-lexeme Q-items, which I suppose is Wikidata Q items
> >>     once the new development is put into the production system. So with
> my
> >>     understanding linking Wikidata Q-items to Wordnet synsets is
> correct. Is
> >>     my understanding correct?
> >>
> >>
> >>     Finn Årup Nielsen
> >>     http://people.compute.dtu.dk/faan/
> >>
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     Wikidata mailing list
> >>     Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
> >>     https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikidata mailing list
> >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to