As a general question, is *it discouraged or encouraged to mirror corporate
data on Wikidata as public repository?*

*Could you provide a bullet list of why discouraged?*

*How does the decision process work?*

Referring to:
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Introduction
> Data is entered and maintained* by Wikidata editors*, who decide on the
> rules of content creation and management.
> Referring to:
> *A secondary database.* Wikidata records not just statements, but also
> their sources, and connections to other databases.




*According to wikidata editors, is it possible to index web sources and
collate their data on WD?*How do they deal with bulks or pieces of data
that may be provided by users ?

Indexing the web does not require agreements, since any web crowler of
search engines works indeed like that.

Here, a crowd of people can coordinate themselve to create a *consistent*
database.

I believe consistency is a key to serve *Anyone in the world.*

> Anyone can use Wikidata for any number of different ways by using its
> application programming interface.


I think applications that have "value" in the sense of corporate datasets
can be built over data including business profiles and ownership towards
other participated  /subsidiaries companies and stakeholders who
participate in the business.

Imagine a minimised version of Bloomberg of Bureau Van Dijk, free to serve
* a**nyone in the world.*

*****

I think I could contribute in three ways:

   - collecting data
   - designing test-application to facilitate crowd-sourced addition of
   data
   - providing a simplified guide to treat Wikidata properties on a
   specific case (a kind of info-graphic, but need very clear guidance in the
   entities and properties for corporates).




On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Jakob Voß <[email protected]> wrote:

> Laura Morales wrote:
>
> OK, just asked. Their reply was that they "reserves the right under
>> paragraph 3.3 of ODbL to release the database under different terms",
>> which is to say their data is NOT free because they want to control
>> how and where the data is used. Are we starting to see "free vs open"
>> all over again, this time with data instead of software?
>>
>
> This means we could re-publish the data openly once we actually get it but
> they make it hard to get their data :-(
>
> I'd still try to be open about OpenCorporates and keep on asking them. If
> they don't switch to more open data sharing, they will likely be replaced,
> that's for sure. So work independently from OpenCorporates but keep
> compatible unless they actively reject to work with Wikidata in any way.
>
> Cheers,
> Jakob
>
> --
> Jakob Voß <[email protected]>
> Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) / Common Library Network
> Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
> +49 (0)551 39-10242, http://www.gbv.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to