Hoi,
And given that DBpedia finds its changes from the RSS feed for an
increasing number of Wikipedias and given that we at Wikidata do not even
regularly harvest data based on "category contains" on a regular basis
(just as an example) there is no justifiable room for any sense of
superiority at Wikidata.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 May 2018 at 20:35, David Abián <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wikipedia isn't a read-only interface but an editable project, so there
> will always be contents in Wikipedia that aren't in Wikidata, so DBpedia
> will always have the opportunity to offer contents from Wikipedia that
> aren't in Wikidata. That's all.
>
> El 05/05/18 a las 19:52, Andy Mabbett escribió:
> >> I don't mean a technical lack of expressiveness, but the impossibility,
> >> and lack of intention, for Wikipedia to become a read-only interface of
> >> Wikidata someday.
> > Well, neither is DBpedia, so I don't see how that substantiates your
> claim.
>
> --
> David Abián
> Wikimedia España
> https://wikimedia.es/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
