> > More simply, there's still a long way to go until Wikidata imports all the > data contained in Wikipedia infoboxes (or equivalent data from other > sources), let alone the rest.
This surprises me. Are there any statistics somewhere on the rate of Wikipedia's infoboxes fully parsed ? 2018-05-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>: > Andy Mabbett, 05/05/2018 17:33: > >> Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because we'll >>> never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the Wikipedias. >>> >> Can you give an example of something that can be represented in >> DBpedia, but not Wikidata? >> > > More simply, there's still a long way to go until Wikidata imports all the > data contained in Wikipedia infoboxes (or equivalent data from other > sources), let alone the rest. > > So, as Gerard mentions, DBpedia has something more/different to offer. > (The same is true for the various extractions of structured data from > Wiktionary vs. Wiktionary's own unstructured data.) > > That said, the LOD cloud is about links, as far as I understand. Wikidata > should be very interesting in it. > > Federico > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
