To add to Andy's reply, on Wikidata the combination of Ranking ( https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Ranking) , Qualifier ( https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Qualifiers) and References (https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Sources) would enable storing disputed property values. So, it does make sense.
-fariz On Mon, May 7, 2018, 19:27 Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 May 2018 at 00:15, Sylvain Boissel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le sam. 5 mai 2018 à 16:35, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> a > écrit > > >> On 5 May 2018 at 14:39, David Abián <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because > we'll > >> > never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the Wikipedias. > >> > >> Can you give an example of something that can be represented in > >> DBpedia, but not Wikidata? > > > Sure : DBpedia knows the specific values different versions of Wikipedia > > choose to display in the infobox. For example, the size or population of > > countries with disputed borders. This data is useful for researchers > working > > on cultural bias in Wikipedia, but it makes little sense to store it in > > Wikidata. > > Except that does; and Wikidata is more than capable of holding values > from conflicting sources. So again, this does not substantiate the > "Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because > we'll never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the > Wikipedias" claim. > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
