I would be very interested in Wikidatas Relation to Cyc
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyc> on one hand and the semantic Web on the
other.

Jan

Am Fr., 23. Juli 2021 um 01:57 Uhr schrieb Denny Vrandečić <
[email protected]>:

> Hi Thad,
>
> Thanks for asking the questions, and thanks Tobi for the pointers. Man,
> what a lengthy post it was.
>
> I understand that the post answered most of your questions. I think that
> it is entirely possible to layer a prototype semantics over Wikidata, just
> as the DL semantics have been layered over it. I don't remember if such
> work has been done before.
>
> Regarding ISO 5964, I think I probably have looked through it at some
> point, but I don't remember it anymore. SKOS has certainly been a stronger
> influence, and obviously OWL.
>
> I hope that helps with the historical deep dive :) Lydia and I really
> should write that book!
>
> Cheers,
> Denny
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 3:00 PM Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *Tobi - *That blog post 3 is very helpful.  It shows that Denny and I
>> think alike and agree on everything. :-)  His dislike for strong
>> classification.
>> Which is part of my basis, to allow weak relations much more.  And use
>> them.  But how to allow them, and I think the only way is through
>> properties based on the Data Model currently.
>> There are many ways, and SKOS is one way to allow expressing weak
>> relations and we already have some good support with existing properties
>> like P4390 mapping relation type <https://www.wikidata.org/entity/P4390>
>> and a host of others.
>>
>> Denny and I also fear the same things, like not having a flexible enough
>> system to describe our complex world that doesn't always fit into strict
>> rules.  Which is kinda why I've always liked
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secassociative
>> because of it's non-transitivity which allows much flexibility and as he
>> and I would say... avoid "Barbara". :-)
>> Which is pretty much summarized in
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secadvanced
>>
>> Sorry for all the SKOS links but semantic relations helps to describe
>> human knowledge.  How a system represents or portrays semantic relations is
>> where choices are made or have been made.  *And I think the right
>> choices were definitely made.*
>> Overlaying SKOS and the Wikidata properties that sprinkle it into the
>> data model is useful, but I've always been kind of reluctant to do
>> that...probably for the same reasons Denny might give?  Choices between
>> allowing "semantic accuracy" versus "semantic flexibility".  But I think
>> systems like SKOS provide both.  Perhaps it could be argued that OWL
>> provides much less. :-)  Still all KOSs provide great use when they fit
>> well.  How they can fit over Wikidata, as I said, is probably only through
>> properties at this late stage of design and that's fine with me!
>>
>> Still, my main focus is and always will be trying to add human knowledge
>> about concept relations into Wikidata to help machines, to help us.  (the
>> "edges" that humans quickly can deduce in seconds, but still to this day
>> can sometimes take machines days or weeks to figure out).
>>
>> My usage and help to Abstract Wikipedia and Wikidata later on will
>> primarily be around the mapping of relations ... where a lot of the
>> possibilities have already been described years and years ago at the very
>> bottom of this long page:
>> *inter-KOS mapping relationships  <-- *very last row, 3rd column
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#seccorrespondencesISO
>>
>>
>> *Denny - * were you part of or lightly influenced by ISO 5964 through
>> Germany ISO DIN or not .. that also would be good to know.
>>
>> Thad
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
>> https://calendly.com/thadguidry/
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 3:17 PM Tobi Gritschacher <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have a place to look with a link to a page in the
>>>> Community portal that says "History of Wikidata's design and early
>>>> collected meetings, notes, design documents, recordings"
>>>>
>>>
>>> Might not answer your concrete question, but here are some (very) early
>>> blog posts by Denny. They are still a nice read. :)
>>>
>>> 1/3
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/02/22/restricting-the-world/
>>>
>>> 2/3
>>> https://newwwblog.wikimedia.de/2013/06/04/on-truths-and-lies/
>>>
>>> 3/3
>>> https://blog.wikimedia.de/2013/09/12/a-categorical-imperative/
>>>
>>> Cheers, Tobi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>


-- 
Jan Dittrich
UX Design/ Research

Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
https://wikimedia.de

Unsere Vision ist eine Welt, in der alle Menschen am Wissen der Menschheit
teilhaben, es nutzen und mehren können. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
https://spenden.wikimedia.de

Wikimedia Deutschland — Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to