Hi Everyone,

Stephen Downe's is absolutely right: "The dichotomy is not between
proprietary content and open content, ... but between institutionally
manufactured content and community-based content".

Stephen has expressed his disappointment
<http://www.downes.ca/post/54313>at the recent UNESCO/COL Policy Forum
convened in Paris -- the last in a
series of online discussions and workshops aimed at taking OER beyond the
OER community (http://oerworkshop.weebly.com/).  I share Steven's
dissapointment at the closedness and lack of foresight and understanding of
the real issues and challenges we face in mainstream organisational adoption
of OER.

There has been no substantive opportunity for OER practitioners and leaders
from around the world to engage in a community-based approach in designing
and collaborating on the plans for taking OER forward. Where is the open and
collaborative planning under this initiative happening for sustainable OER
futures? We need to transcend the "talk-shop" mentality and move forward
with open collaboration and a healthy dose of open
philanthropy<http://wikieducator.org/Open_Philanthropy>.


The open web is the most powerful enabler we have for social and
organisational transformation in achieving sustainable OER futures. I guess
agencies are free to use closed models for designing open futures behind
closed doors -- but they don't get it. This perpetuates the status quo at
the expense of widening access to learning for the 4 billion people of the
world who are undeserved when it comes to formal education.

I'm disillusioned with the absence of *open* collaboration among mainstream
OER initiatives and suggest that this is one of the major barriers in
building a sustainable OER infrastructure and ecosystem because we refuse to
use our point of difference when compared to closed models -- namely the
freedom to collaborate. If we are serious about getting out of OERs "valley
of death <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_funding>" we must shift our
thinking from sharing for learning, to learning to SHARE. In fields like
OER, it is more important to learn how to receive than to give away. Single
organisation-based OER projects will do more to maintain the status quo,
than transform education for the better.

I think its time to take the "OER implementation challenge" by the horns and
make the future happen. Consider the facts:

   1. The marginal cost of replicating digital knowledge is near zero.
   2. It is far cheaper for ten institutions and individuals to collaborate
   on the development (community approach) than one institution trying to
   manufacture an OER course on their own.  Its an order of magnitude cheaper
   when 100 individuals work together as a community to achieve a common goal.
   3. The traditional institutional model cannot respond to the demand for
   education on our planet. We simply don't have enough money to build the
   institutions to even begin to address this demand -- yet we have the
   technology at our disposal to provide free learning to every person on the
   planet.

Why is there a reluctance (or refusal) by educational leaders of
taxpayer-funded organisations to save cost and widen access to learning,
notwithstanding these obvious facts?

I cannot find any rational reason other than the notion that we are dealing
with a classic text-book case of the "innovator's
dilemma<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruptive_technology>".
The antennas of educational leadership and organisations around the world
are so tuned to responding to the existing closed market signals of the
classical education model -- that they simply "cannot see" the immediate
efficiency gains for a better education system which is free and open. The
literature on transformational management when organisations are faced with
fundamental change precipitated by disruptive technology suggests that it is
not easy to transform from within the organisation :-(. However,
organisations can and do change when faced with a crisis.

The OER movement needs a catalyst -- a quantum shift project that will help
educational leaders and policy-makers open up education.  But more
importantly embrace leadership and take the responsibility to lead.

I propose that we initiate an OER collaboration by design and establish a
free and open university for the world. This is not an institution in the
conventional sense of the word, but a collaboration of like minded
individuals and institutions who will collaborate openly on the remix (or
development) of high-quality open distance learning materials designed for
independent study.  Learners around the world will be free to study at no
cost .

We should collaborate on achieving an inventory of OERs linked to the
graduate profiles of real credentials and invite institutions from the
formal sector who would be willing to provide assessment and credit for
greatly reduced cost when compared to the normal offerings. In this way we
address the impasse of gaining credit for free learning. This is by no means
new or revolutionary thinking --- we just haven't succeeded in scaling this
up in a way that will support mainstream adoption of OER in our instutions.

In the spirit of open philanthropy and a healthy does of the open source
approach of releasing early and frequently -- we are working on draft
concepts here:
http://wikieducator.org/OER_for_Assessment_and_Credit_for_Students .

The OER Foundation, Otago Polytechnic and the University of Southern
Queensland will be hosting a strategic planning meeting in Dunedin, New
Zealand on 23 February 2011 to progress this agenda.

We will develop the strategy and operational plans openly and transparently
in the wiki under a project called "OER for assessment and credit for
students".

We extend an open invitation to international agencies like COL and UNESCO
to join us. We extend an open invitation to all formerly registered tertiary
education providers of the world to join us. We expect collaborators to play
by the rules of the
game<http://wikieducator.org/OER_for_Assessment_and_Credit_for_Students>because
we are serious about the mainstream adoption of OER and getting this
right.

Let's make OER futures happen :-).

Cheers
Wayne





-- 
Wayne Mackintosh <http://wikieducator.org/User:Mackiwg>, Ph.D.
Director OER Foundation <http://www.oerfoundation.org>
Director, International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Founder and elected Community Council Member,
Wikieducator<http://www.wikieducator.org%20>
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/Mackiwg> |
identi.ca<http://identi.ca/waynemackintosh>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to