Hmmm,

"Valley of death" eh?

OK, WE want to take the OE(R) movement into the mainstream. So can we
forget how much content we might produce (for a sec) and think about
the infrastructure a global "300" might need to do a charge forward.
The 'mainstream' is a series of networks which .edu content sits on.
Access to them begins with a sign on to some institutional silo, which
wil sit on one of these NREN(etworks).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_research_and_education_network

We are seeing these networks beginning to 'federate' their services.
(wikieducator, and other OERs are 'service providers')
E.g. http://www.aaf.edu.au/index.php/services/service-catalogue/
http://www.cuccio-cdpiuc.ca/en/canadian-access-federation/index.php
http://www.aaf.edu.au/index.php/services/international-federations/
Incommons in the US.

Registering wikieducator as a 'common' service provider for these
networks puts it into the mainstream of National edu networks (which
means the WE community can start talking to 'their' NRENs about the
other 'common services' they might want).

But before WE go off and take the easy yards, can we give some thought
to the other global OERers who may not like using a wiki to co-produce
content. E.g. I'd prefer something like global plaza.
http://www.globalplaza.org/spaces/global
So I could link together OERers, and track/record/archive all the
conversations which happen when a production is taking place.

Could we also give some thought to a directory, not of services, but
of content. Ideally we are attempting to aggregate similar content
(communities) from around the world. The idea that there are not
enough OER seems a bit silly. OERers simply haven't thought through
how customers can find similar content (communities), regardless of
language. We have this wacking huge library of amazing content called
the web, and simply no way of classifying it in such a way that a
potential contributor can find the shelf on which they should put (and
take) 'their' bits.

WE need to bring together, not just some good National(REN) techs, but
also some good National librarians in order to provide for global,
disciplinary groups and their communities of interest. WE could also
use some very demanding WE'ers who can describe the kinds of tools
they need.

Stephen's done this quite a few times now. But he's never addressed
the network people who might actually construct them.

regards,
simonfj




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]

Reply via email to