> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Thomas Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is only one way to prove any of that, though, and that's giving >> it a go. If we only make the flagged rev the default version for >> articles that are currently (semi-)protected keeping up with the >> sighting would be easy - that's the version of the proposal that >> should be completely uncontroversial. > > You would think— But thats only true if the resistance is driven by a > risk analysis, it's not true for resistance driven by either a hard > philosophical objection (The "unwiki" position taken by many in the > discussions) or due to an attempt to thwart change in general. In > either of these cases you could demonstrate that it works great and > those opinions would not change. Moreover, the possibility that a test > may be successful and dispel fears is a reason to oppose testing for > opponents whom care about things other than success.
But flagged revisions for currently protected pages is more wiki than protected pages... _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
