> Proof that having the sighted revision as the standard view (which you > have to for it to be meaningfully useful) doesn't result in a drop in > editing rate. > > Proof that en would be able to keep up with the required rate of > sighting (We have a hard time marking new pages as patrolled at the > moment) > > If you want to use drug articles as the foundation for your argument > proof that it would provide any protection against subtle vandalism.
There is only one way to prove any of that, though, and that's giving it a go. If we only make the flagged rev the default version for articles that are currently (semi-)protected keeping up with the sighting would be easy - that's the version of the proposal that should be completely uncontroversial. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
