2008/12/17 Wily D <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> 2008/12/16 David Gerard <[email protected]>: >>> 2008/12/16 Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Sounds like a fantastic idea. Only problem seems to be that they >>>> publish the wikipedia articles/summaries before the papers, it needs >>>> to be the other way around so the paper can be a reference for the >>>> summary. >>> >>> >>> * '''d''', nn, v, auto, spam - ~~~~ >> >> Are you serious? >> > That would be the outcome at AfD, assuming it got there, which would > depend on how trigger happy the C:CSD patrollers that day are.
It's discussed in a peer reviewed journal, that covers verifiability. I don't see how it's autobiographical, it's about science, not a person. It's not commercial, so it's not spam. I'm not sure what the notability guidelines are for science, so I guess it might fail there, I'd have to look it up. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
