Hefty point for the writers who do not get a new article accepted and resort to promoting their web page (no self reference) or usenet article -- get warned and then wonder what is left to do, here (hordes, of course, and you gotta look). Looking at it this way, "Nature" might seem out of order, and you never can tell if someone might gravitate to tweaking stuff out of their field. (I'm a stylist. Supposed to an eventualist...stuborn, maybe. [Okay...one more piece of spam control, belay concerns with Jeremy Hanson that I can not directly support, ATM, then I try to colour that fractal that looks like a cat if I can find it --booger-- lost drive for testing music. OH! I haven't done any caffeine in ten hours. Maybe I can clear my spam kyuu, after all.]).
Anybody welcomed somebody with suggestbot? _______ Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it. --Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi From: "David Gerard" <[email protected]> > 2008/12/16 Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>: > >> Sounds like a fantastic idea. Only problem seems to be that they >> publish the wikipedia articles/summaries before the papers, it needs >> to be the other way around so the paper can be a reference for the >> summary. > > > * '''d''', nn, v, auto, spam - ~~~~ > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
