Hi, Thanks for clarifying.
> This is an excellent experiment. With Wikipedia's open edit process I am > confident that the plan will adjust as it is implemented and I, for one > would like to see more academic journals take on this tact of publishing > their results under GFDL (on Wikipedia or their own journal). Knowledge is > power only if there is access to that knowledge. The issue I have, though, is that I feel that Wikipedia is doing a bad job of giving people "knowledge". Many scientists (I would assume--the proof of the concept is in the editing, I suppose) would agree with my position. These people might object to having their "knowledge" placed on Wikipedia to be torn apart and/or built up by the ignorant masses (no offense intended). The idea might work, but I'm willing to step out and say that I don't think it will. On the other hand, I might be pleasantly wrong :-). --Thomas Larsen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
