On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:24 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081216/full/news.2008.1312.html > > What could possibly go wrong? > > (Urgent outreach needed from relevant wikiprojects!) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >
Actually, from the article... "The RNA wiki is a subset of a broader project, the WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology..." Seems like we've already got a WikiProject involved here. My question is more if the GFDL and "anyone can edit" implications are being made clear to the scientists publishing. Most scientific papers are reasonably well referenced, so I don't think there's any problem there, but it would certainly be unfortunate to see someone confused about the fact that the paper can be changed and redistributed at will. -- Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
