On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Philip Sandifer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:11 PM, toddmallen wrote: > >> He might also choose to blog about his dog. That doesn't mean we >> should have an article on that either. > > If his dog were an online game, i.e. his area of expertise, then yes, > his blogging about it would mean that. Or at least, be a good sign of > that. > > -Phil > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >
Not really sure that holds water either. If it were an expert dog trainer blogging about their dog, that still wouldn't really be a reason for an article on that dog. Fact-checking and publication by someone other than oneself are required for good reason. -- Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
