AFDs cannot conclude as a "merge". AFDs are meant to be a binary decision. Something will either end up getting deleted or not. AFDs shouldn't go any further. - White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Ken Arromdee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Noah Salzman wrote: > > Makes sense to me. If the "articles for deletion" process is usurped > > by the "articles for purgatory" process then it transforms the debate > > entirely. If you keep losing at chess than change the game to > > checkers, rather than continuing to complain about losing at chess. > > It's already happened, with articles for deletion replaced by "merging" on > the > grounds that merging is not deletion. > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
