But they do and theyn have for quite some time. Other results from an AFD are cleanup, redirect, no consensus (default keep), keep, delete, I think there are a few others. It *is* widely accepted practice and has been for as long as I have been here.
On 1/13/09, White Cat <[email protected]> wrote: > AFDs cannot conclude as a "merge". AFDs are meant to be a binary decision. > Something will either end up getting deleted or not. AFDs shouldn't go any > further. > - White Cat > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Ken Arromdee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Noah Salzman wrote: >> > Makes sense to me. If the "articles for deletion" process is usurped >> > by the "articles for purgatory" process then it transforms the debate >> > entirely. If you keep losing at chess than change the game to >> > checkers, rather than continuing to complain about losing at chess. >> >> It's already happened, with articles for deletion replaced by "merging" on >> the >> grounds that merging is not deletion. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
