AFD itself is quite broken. Decisions made at AFD may
not necessarily represent the best interest of the site. The use of DRV had
skyrocketed over the passing years. Originally there was no need for a DRV.
  - White Cat

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2009/1/14 Carcharoth <[email protected]>:
>
> > "cleanup" is not an AfD result I've ever seen. It has been a
> > long-standing axiom as far as I can remember that AfD is not cleanup.
> > What *can* happen is someone closes as keep or no consensus, and then
> > *adds* their opinion (or that of others) that cleanup is needed. But
> > that is not a close of "cleanup".
>
>
> This does not square with practice, where people will aggressively
> defend whatever the AFD comes out as. "But the AFD consensus was to
> GUT THAT LIST!"
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to