Agree with Sam, I'm not supporting Jimmy because it's clear in calling himself the sole founder he is wrong & shouldn't do it, but I really don't see the need to continue this issue. There is no tiptoeing around Jimmy Wales as can be seen by many people's views on here(I'm sure he's reading it) & in Wikipedia articles. There is a general consensus that on this particular matter, Jimmy is unreliable & almost everyone agrees, so why the continuation? If there is anyone here who believes that Jimmy is right & is the sole & only founder, please make yourself known, otherwise can we just end this pointless, yes pointless, feud.
Just my view! :,) On 09/04/2009 17:33, Sam Korn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Larry Sanger > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In the end, assuming the Wikipedia community and Board reacts to this in a >> mature, decent manner, it could come out of this stronger and better. On >> the other hand, if you pretend that it isn't happening, or dismiss my >> concerns, you'll just be digging yourselves even deeper into the hole you're >> already in. Remember: the world is watching. >> > > What hole are we in, pray? > > Your concerns seem to be that Jimmy is not acknowledging your role and > status as you'd like, and that the community and the Board are silent > in the face of Jimmy's doing this. For my part, this silence may be > attributed to insouciance -- I care little for the minutiae of history > now eight years old and for your personal (yes, personal) dispute with > Jimmy. > > Perhaps you can explain what the world at large, the Wikipedia > community and I personally gain from publicly pursuing it. > > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
