Just out of interest, what is "doing it right" in this context. Is a link to http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f1/Houses_of_Parliament.jpg plus an extended text along the lines of, say, the bottom of http://www.answers.com/topic/bahrain-football-club required?
I've seen (source:Wikipedia) quoted a few times on media pictures now. ----- "David Gerard" <[email protected]> wrote: > From: "David Gerard" <[email protected]> > To: "English Wikipedia" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, 4 June, 2009 21:55:23 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, > Portugal > Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] GDFL compliance > > 2009/6/4 Andrew Turvey <[email protected]>: > > > It's great to see more and more people re-using Wikipedia content. such as > > this: http://euobserver.com/9/28232 > > However, does this comply with the GDFL license? All it says by way of > > attribution is "(Photo: wikipedia)" > > If not, is there a group of people somewhere who chase up copyvios like > > this? > > > Usually if someone (preferably the creator) contacts them suggesting > how to do it right, places are keen to get it right. Asking nicely and > reasonably is effective in practice. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
