-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, I mean, what difference does it make? I guess it probably should have a link, but, honestly, with the number of Wikipedia images being reused these days, I don't think it would be worth it to attempt to track them all down... - --Unionhawk
Carcharoth wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Casey Brown<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Andrew >> Turvey<[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip> > >>> I've seen (source:Wikipedia) quoted a few times on media pictures now. >> Well, that's the media. :-) They're used to being able to just say >> random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever. > > That's true. But even print sources *should* give a full credit line > if asked to do so. > > That should ideally include the name of the photographer, and that it > is GFDL content. Technically, I'm not sure if Wikipedia even needs to > be mentioned (we are just the middleman), but I'm sure there is some > clause somewhere that requires it. > > Carcharoth > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkovEGMACgkQSPTq06lEuY/rowCfZZt1Us2u14MmRW6kiJhTMQH/ L68An0EE9DYfTxCON+Ob/ZLWNj/wyiWR =7/Yt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
