Andrew Turvey wrote: > -- "Casey Brown" wrote: > >> Well, that's the media. :-) They're used to being able to just say >> random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever. >> ;-) >> > Yeah - but the difference there is that they're actually paying Reuters for > it and using it with their permission! > > Sure there is that difference, but it is not *the* difference. How is the statement "random" or how does it make "no sense". It states where they got it from. Howe they got it or under what terms is completely irrelevant.
Ec _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
