On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Andrew Gray<[email protected]> wrote: > I have, interestingly, been noticing it moving in exactly the opposite direction; articles with a couple of paragraphs of text, a reference > or two, an image or an infobox, being marked as "stubs". There's > standards inflation at both ends of the rating system...
IMHO, this kind of thing is one of Wikipedia's greatest failings. We still can't even agree on a definition of things like "stub", and it seems to be in everyone's interest not to. People like stuff like that being subjective. (FWIW, I think it's reasonable to have "stub" be relative to the expected content. Two paragraphs on a country would clearly be a "stub". Two paragraphs on an obscure medieval scribe might be the most comprehensive resource possible.) Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
