the lack of visible reward will have the same effect on them as on new
contributors.

David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG



On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:15 PM, David Gerard<dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/28 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>:
>> 2009/8/28 David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com>:
>
>>> Protection is a failure of the wiki model in the first place.
>>> Discussion is a poor substitute for editing.
>
>> Edit warring is a failure of the wiki model. We use protection to
>> force people into a discussion model which works better in those
>> situations.
>
>
> Yeah, it's all imperfect. What I mean is, that's a bit of process for
> a particular purpose, and if we need it with flagged revs as we do
> with full protection, then we can reintroduce it when we do. I think
> the lack of visible reward will be helpful in dealing with everyday
> edit warriors. (If people with the reviewer bit edit-war with it, one
> or both is likely to get a strong word at the very least.)
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to