> It doesn't have anything to do with the release of the software, > it's just a matter of using the right tool for the right job.
You're right. My bad. Emily On Sep 13, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/9/13 Emily Monroe <[email protected]>: >>> You can restrict the editing, but if you don't intend for your group >>> of readers and your group of writers to overlap heavily, then you >>> shouldn't be using wiki software. There are better ways for a small >>> group to collaborate of material intended for a much larger group to >>> read. >> >> I also agree with this. The "letter" of releasing Mediawiki to the >> public mean anyone can use it for any purpose, but the "spirit" >> dictates that if you don't intend to have people edit it in a >> "Wikipedia-style" fashion (ie We assume good faith here, so you start >> out with these editing privileges), then you need to go elsewhere. > > It doesn't have anything to do with the release of the software, it's > just a matter of using the right tool for the right job. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
