On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is how I envision this WikiJournal prospective. Not as another > university-driven nowheresville which gets no traction because the vast > majority > of the world doesn't really care to read highly scientific and technical > articles. > > Another example might be, let's say that you write a piece on intricate > details of the Watergate scandal, as an investigative journalist. It's not > "news" but I would think WikiJournal (or whatever) might be a perfect venue > to > have such an article peer-reviewed. WikiNews is not peer-reviewed. >
How is this different than the "peer review" at Wikipedia? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
