In a message dated 9/13/2009 2:14:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> The "letter" of releasing Mediawiki to the > public mean anyone can use it for any purpose, but the "spirit" > dictates that if you don't intend to have people edit it in a > "Wikipedia-style" fashion (ie We assume good faith here, so you start > out with these editing privileges), then you need to go elsewhere.>> I dont' agree with this feeling unless you mean "people" in a loose way. I don't want *anyone* to edit my own wiki. I encourage people to do so, but I will also block certain articles to signed-in users only, or block others to myself only. I think that's my right as owner of my own wiki. I would even encourage people who simply want to use the wiki to do simple mark-up. I mean want easier way to migrate into full HTML than using Mediawiki? What are the alternatives? I haven't seen one that makes it quite so easy. I would however like a per-article option to *not save revisions*. Some articles just don't benefit from revision history. Will Johnson _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
