On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rich Holton <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd say that Time magazine and the eBay culprit(s) *should* have given > Durova credit for the restoration. But the "should" I'm using has to do with > common decency--something that is becoming rather uncommon.
As that page stands, I'm not sure they *could* have done that, let alone *should*. There is not a single indication anywhere on that page that this image contains much hard work by a Wikipedian, and that that hard work should be acknowledged. There is the brief comment "Restored version of Image:Stroop Report - Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 06.jpg with artifacts and scratches removed, levels adjusted, and image sharpened..", and there Durova's name is listed as the uploader...but you have to read between the lines to decide that Durova performed the work, and that that work is worth acknowledging. Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
