On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rich Holton <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd say that Time magazine and the eBay culprit(s) *should* have given > > Durova credit for the restoration. But the "should" I'm using has to do > with > > common decency--something that is becoming rather uncommon. > > As that page stands, I'm not sure they *could* have done that, let > alone *should*. There is not a single indication anywhere on that page > that this image contains much hard work by a Wikipedian, and that that > hard work should be acknowledged. There is the brief comment "Restored > version of Image:Stroop Report - Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 06.jpg with > artifacts and scratches removed, levels adjusted, and image > sharpened..", and there Durova's name is listed as the uploader...but > you have to read between the lines to decide that Durova performed the > work, and that that work is worth acknowledging. > > We're actually talking about different images...but I think your point still applies. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
