On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Ryan Delaney wrote: > Actually, it's the other way around. Deliberately writing a bad article that > should be deleted, but doesn't technically fit the CSD due to some loophole, > sounds like the definition of disruption to make a point. I'd have to see a > test case to say that for sure.
But CSD *isn't for deleting everything that should be deleted*. So the fact that the article doesn't fit CSD but should be deleted anyway isn't a loophole. Plenty of things which should be deleted don't fit CSD. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
