On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:50 PM, stevertigo <stv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ryan Delaney <ryan.dela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > You might be misunderstanding what the objection is here. Nobody needs to > be > > reminded that use of sysop tools is subject to peer review. > > True (though I don't think David is misunderstanding anything). The > issue is not reviewing how sysops use their tools. It is about > correcting the misconceptions upon which sysops base a substantially > destructive usage of those tools. > > I think that's a noble goal, and the idea behind this project seems like a good one. Incidentally, I'm probably in the running for most rabid inclusionist here. I think we all ought to be able to understand, though, that it goes too far when the experiment itself becomes a source of disruption. I don't know all the details, but I'm guessing that's why WSC asked to put it on hold. -- causa sui _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
