On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:00 PM, David Goodman <[email protected]> wrote:
> so far from being disruptive, the project is an attempt to > demonstrate the ongoing disruption being routinely carried out by > people deleting improvable articles. sometimes a few test cases are > the clearest way to show that, and the project seems to have made done > that very successfully. We now need to consider how to improve what we > do so the discouragement of new authors decreases. > > I remind everyone that what admins do is open and can and should be > audited. Though that was not the purpose of the project, it is > perfectly in order to check the deletions of individual admins. We > should expect at least the same knowledge of basic rules we look for > at an RfA. > > David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG > > > You might be misunderstanding what the objection is here. Nobody needs to be reminded that use of sysop tools is subject to peer review. -- causa sui _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
