On 27 August 2010 01:18, Ian Woollard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Remember that we do have DRV for >> controversial decisions. A simpler change, which I've proposed before, would >> be to require admins to give a rationale for their close on any AfD that is >> not >> unanimous. > They still can say more or less whatever they want, it doesn't remove > bias from an administrator in any way. The bias is often in who > decides the AfD. To swing this, you'd probably need quite a large amount of AFD closure data demonstrating (preferably inarguable) bias. Ideally, you'd need to show that it was inherent to the process, rather than because of a few individuals not sufficiently checking their biases at the door. (this is evaluating your arguments, rather than an opinion on whether what they argue for is good or not) - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
