On 27/08/2010, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > To swing this, you'd probably need quite a large amount of AFD closure > data demonstrating (preferably inarguable) bias. Ideally, you'd need > to show that it was inherent to the process, rather than because of a > few individuals not sufficiently checking their biases at the door.
I would expect that that could be done, but I'd have to think about it. But if the process allows people not to check their biases at the door, then that's a problem in the process. Actually, the politics of the Wikipedia would probably make an interesting case-study for some academic. > (this is evaluating your arguments, rather than an opinion on whether > what they argue for is good or not) That's perfectly fair enough. It may even be that it's not a good idea. The principle of unexpected consequences and all that. > - d. -- -Ian Woollard _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
