> The thing is, it takes a conspiracy within the Wikipedia's rank and > file to bias an article significantly over a long period; otherwise > normal editing and then RFCs and so forth will tend sort it out. > > If it remains sufficiently inaccurate then the target will kick up a > big fuss; initially within the Wikipedia, and then other places like > Wikipedia Review and eventually in the press. The more people that > look at the bias, the less sustainable the position of the conspiracy > becomes.
Firms, organizations, or even individuals with PR budgets in the millions, or passionate, but sane, supporters can and do much better than that. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
