> The article doesn't say that a conspiracy within Wikipedia tried to bias > articles. It says that a prominent industrialist and political > contributor > paid professional writers to alter Wikipedia articles to change the > descriptions of his involvement in a political movement. > > It's a situation where organized professionals are working against > unorganized amateurs. If it takes conspiracies within Wikipedia to > counteract that kind of influence then we perhaps need more of them. >
Actually, the editor was rather amateurish. I have some doubt this was professional work by his firm that was paid for. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
