On 28 March 2011 15:46, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > However, noting what the subject says is surely apposite in the > general case, even if it's delusional - as long as it can be > reasonably cited in a source that is almost certainly said subject.
Not really the case article in question is Giovanni di Stefano. A fraudster (he has a conviction from the 80s). Using his own words presents two problems. Firstly it would accuse of being technically guilty of things I'm pretty sure he isn't. Secondly one of the lines he was trying to push has just been reported on by the crown prosecution service: "The charges refer to events between 2004 and 2009 and the alleged deceptions include representations that he was a qualified Italian lawyer." http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/press_statements/cps_statement_on_giovanni_di_stefano/ You see the problem? -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
