> On 28 March 2011 15:46, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> However, noting what the subject says is surely apposite in the >> general case, even if it's delusional - as long as it can be >> reasonably cited in a source that is almost certainly said subject. > > Not really the case article in question is Giovanni di Stefano. A > fraudster (he has a conviction from the 80s). Using his own words > presents two problems. Firstly it would accuse of being technically > guilty of things I'm pretty sure he isn't. Secondly one of the lines > he was trying to push has just been reported on by the crown > prosecution service: > > "The charges refer to events between 2004 and 2009 and the alleged > deceptions include representations that he was a qualified Italian > lawyer." > > http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/press_statements/cps_statement_on_giovanni_di_stefano/ > > You see the problem? > -- > geni
Do I ever. Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
