Anthony wrote: > You certainly should revert Gwern's changes. There's no dispute about that.
Indeed, but that's a different context; we were discussing the appropriateness of Gwern's experiment and ones like it. > > > The data may still be useful. > > Agreed. I don't assert that the experiment is invalid. I note that > > *others* do. > Which others? Ian Woollard, Carcharoth and David Gerard have questioned the experiment's value. My point, of course, doesn't relate to those comments in particular. As I said, criticism should have been solicited and addressed beforehand. > What's a "consensus-backed experiment"? An experiment whose validity and appropriateness have been affirmed by the community. David Levy _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
