2010/6/21 Juliana da Costa José <[email protected]>: > My oppinion as an actual working member of this year Wikimania, would be to > discuss this after the venue. If everything is finished, the leading team > will write a report about the things which happened positivly and negativly. > I think on this base it would be more revealing to discuss alterations in > familiar Wikimania structure of planning.
Every year there has been a plan to write a report afterwards on what went well, what didn't, etc.. Has such a report ever actually been written? I've never seen one (sometimes we get the results of a survey of attendees with some minimal analysis, but that's about it). It would be really good if we could get such a report, especially this year since there definitely have been things that have gone wrong. (I know it is very tempting, and understandable, to collapse in exhaustion once the event is finished and never get around to writing the report - I've done exactly the same thing before - so I'm not blaming anyone, just emphasising how useful such a report would be.) _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
