On 21 June 2010 21:11, Mariano Cecowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --- El lun 21-jun-10, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> escribió: > >> The idea of a post-mortem is to learn for the future, so it >> isn't really worth having one if you don't publish the results >> for future teams can learn from them. > > I just wanted to remind everyone that Wikimania 2009 did create a publicly > available post-mortem. I recommend both th Gdansk and Haifa teams to take a > look at it: > > http://wikimania2009.wikimedia.org/wiki/Post-mortem
Yes, there is that and it is much better than nothing, but I'd like to see much more detailed post-mortems. That's mostly just the results of a survey of attendees and some analysis of it and conclusions drawn from it. Such a survey is a very useful part of a post-mortem, but it shouldn't be the basis of the whole thing. There isn't, for example, anything in there saying whether you managed to stay in budget or not and if not, why not and by how much you went over. That kind of information would be extremely useful for people putting together bids (since the things you overspent on or forgot to budget for are likely to be things they'll underestimate the cost of, or forget, too). _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
