I wouldn't be too sure of that. You need to consider who the targeted
audience is for your feedback. I would guess the organizers of the coming
year(s). So a postmortem would make most sense on the wikimaniateamwiki
(yes, another internal wiki). I had in 2008 for example much use of the
program committee postmortem documentation of 2007 in Taiwan - even though
it was not public. As long as it reaches the right people. It is a lot of
effort to make a public version in some cases, and then I really dont see
the point of obligating people to make such a version - especially if the
consequence of that is that the chance they actually will do that,
decreases.

Lodewijk

2010/6/21 Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>

> On 21 June 2010 22:25, Liam Wyatt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you don't allow for private discussion and post-mortems within a group
> of
> > people, then the likelyhood of effective management and feedback
> decreases.
> > This is not because the Wikimania team is being secretive, but because
> > talking only amongst yourselves that know each other best gives a place
> to
> > air honest feedback in a way that would not happen if that feeback
> between
> > the team was forced to be public. Furthermore, there is sensitive
> > information about things like sponsors, finances, relationships between
> > people that simply don't need to be made public as it would cause more
> harm
> > than good. Every chapter has a private executive channel, and even the
> > Wikimedia movement has an internal mailing list - none of these imply
> that
> > the rest of the community is "external" but simply that some things are
> best
> > kept private. Furthermore, you can't actually force people to talk in
> > public, all you do is drive it underground turning what is a legitimate
> > internal discusison into a cabal.
>
> The discussion can happen in private, but the results need to be
> public or there is really no point. The people discussing it will
> probably never run a Wikimania again, so they don't really need to
> know what did and didn't work. Anything that needs to be confidential
> can be redacted from the public version and the un-redacted version
> only shared with people that specifically need to know (teams
> organising future Wikimanias, and maybe those bidding to organise
> them).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

Reply via email to