My stance remains unchanged, time is money first of all. Provided paid editing is devoid of advertisement and PR undertones, some see it as a motivation to get work done in a quick way so long as the editor sticks to quality and uses verifiable facts devoid of bias and shoddy work...
We can not run away from this issue until it's permanently resolved, see below for a case related to it: http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/wikipedia-is-too-late-to-stop-paid-editing/46793 http://www.about.me/oralofori On Feb 21, 2014 6:58 AM, "Sandister Tei" <[email protected]> wrote: > Paid editing and disclosure policy > <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment>in > discussion at WMF. > > Join the discussion. > > > Regards, > Sandister Tei > ----- > Cardiff University > JOMEC -- International Journalism > www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686 > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-GH mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-GH mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
