It's not about our opinions within the m.list. The discussion on the page I shared will be likely imposed.
Our say and contribution will be more powerful when sent to that discussion. On Feb 21, 2014 2:12 PM, "Oral Ofori" <[email protected]> wrote: > My stance remains unchanged, time is money first of all. > > Provided paid editing is devoid of advertisement and PR undertones, some > see it as a motivation to get work done in a quick way so long as the > editor sticks to quality and uses verifiable facts devoid of bias and > shoddy work... > > We can not run away from this issue until it's permanently resolved, see > below for a case related to it: > > > http://www.itbusiness.ca/blog/wikipedia-is-too-late-to-stop-paid-editing/46793 > > http://www.about.me/oralofori > On Feb 21, 2014 6:58 AM, "Sandister Tei" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Paid editing and disclosure policy >> <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment>in >> discussion at WMF. >> >> Join the discussion. >> >> >> Regards, >> Sandister Tei >> ----- >> Cardiff University >> JOMEC -- International Journalism >> www.sandistertei.com | +447448223686 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-GH mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-GH mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-GH mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
